Bug#231015: libm.so: symlink should be relative

To: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
Cc: Yann Dirson <dirson@debian.org>, 231015@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#231015: libm.so: symlink should be relative
From: Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 16:53:58 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040204155358.GR23802@bylbo.nowhere.earth>
Reply-to: Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org>, 231015@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040204144651.GB27643@nevyn.them.org>
References: <[🔎] 20040203235340.GA8336@bylbo.nowhere.earth> <[🔎] 20040204144651.GB27643@nevyn.them.org>

On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 09:46:51AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> For anyone else as confused by this message as I was: the "relative" in
> the subject line should be "absolute".

Thanks for pointing that out Daniel - let's blame the lack of sleep, as usual :)

-- 
Yann Dirson    <ydirson@altern.org> |    Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ?
Debian-related: <dirson@debian.org> |   Support Debian GNU/Linux:
Pro:    <yann.dirson@fr.alcove.com> |  Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratuity
     http://ydirson.free.fr/        | Check <http://www.debian.org/>

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#231015: libm.so: symlink should be relative
  - From: Yann Dirson <dirson@debian.org>
- Bug#231015: libm.so: symlink should be relative
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Processed: Re: Bug#231015: libm.so: symlink should be relative
Next by Date: Processed: retitle 231015 to Bug#231015: libm.so: symlink should be absolute
Previous by thread: Bug#231015: libm.so: symlink should be relative
Next by thread: Bug#231015: libm.so: symlink should be relative
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread