On Sat, 2003-12-27 at 03:50, Paul Eggert wrote: > > Thanks for the fix for mktime.c[0] - Is this a file that will eventually > > be synchronized into glibc as part of the usual gnulib administrivia? > That's the intent, but it's been several months now and I haven't > gotten around to it. Is that something that you can do easily? > Every change in gnulib mktime.c should be migrated to glibc. > If this is not easy for you to do (e.g., you don't have glibc checkin > privileges), then please don't bother; I'll get to it eventually. I don't have glibc check-in - I can post the patch to libc-hacker, though. It's been a while since I've looked at this, but it appears that the files should be identical, right? (All the #ifdef _LIBC constructs are still in place). If yes, I can put together a series of patches to get it back in sync. Tks, Jeff Bailey -- In the United States, there isn't a government database that hasn't been misused by the very people entrusted with keeping its information safe. - Bruce Schneier
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part