Re: cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by jbailey
On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 04:07:04PM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote:
> > > Ah, good thought. Taking a look at the results, should we be compiling
> > > 2.3.2-1 mips{el} with gcc-3.3?
> > Will we switch to gcc-3.3 as default compiler anytime soon? If not this
> > might be a good move. OTOH Glibc 2.3.2 doesn't build on mips at the
> > moment.
> Correction. It does build now. We'll need the patch
> http://honk.physik.uni-konstanz.de/linux-mips/glibc/patches/experimental/glibc-2.3.2-build-fix.diff
> and binutils 2.14.90.0.1. The number of failing testcases doesn't look
> much worse than with 2.3.1:
> http://honk.physik.uni-konstanz.de/linux-mips/glibc/patches/experimental/test-failures-mips-o32-2.3.2.txt
The isomac failure is suspicious and might cause grief down the road - Can you
post the .out file for me to look at?
tls13 is a new test, so I think we can ignore it for now.
Thanks for this!
--
You said homosexuals form a small percentage of the population. So
do Jews. Is that a reason to deny someone equality?
- Richard Marceau
Reply to: