[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#190638: out of date headers



At Sat, 26 Apr 2003 10:23:07 -0400,
Christian T. Steigies <cts@debian.org> wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 01:01:23PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > Sorry, I failed to send to debian-68k lists...
> > 
> > At 24 Apr 2003 17:26:57 -0400,
> > Andres Salomon wrote:
> > > After talking w/ infinity on IRC, I realize now what the problem is; the
> > > headers in m68k's glibc are from 2.4.14.  I'm told that there is an
> > > attempt to update to 2.4.20, which should fix the issue..
> > 
> > Yes, that's right.  I wonder why m68k kernel package is out of date
> > from the current 2.4.20.  2.4.14 becomes old because 2.4.14 is
> > appeared 1.5 years ago.
> > 
> > debian-m68k guys, are there any problems for the newer kernel? IIRC
> > kernel guys (like Geert) have been efforted to update for 2.4.
> 
> You know that m68k is a little slower than other arches, so 1.5 years is not
> too bad ;-)

Umm, we should increase m68k buildd more and more :)

> The problem is, 2.4 does not work too well for m68k, it works on amiga
> (since 2.4.18 for me), it does not boot on mac, and I haven't heard anything
> about atari, bvme6000, mvme147, mvme16x. However, kernel-images for all
> subarches have been install on april 21 (and hadn't I made a stupid mistake
> and all the autobuilders tried to build it and failed, and hadn't I received
> serious bugs for this, it might already be in testing...). kernel-headers
> were uploaded on the 22nd, so they will be installed, hmm, tomorrow?

Cool, now kernel-images-2.4.20-* for m68k has come!

> So this will fix the toolchain problem and thus gtk+2.0 after we rebuild
> glibc with the new kernel-headers? Anybody on m68k-build working on this
> already?

The problem is there is no kernel-headers-2.4.20.  We have only
kernel-headers-2.4.14-m68k.  Are there any chances to update
kernel-headers bumping up to 2.4.20?

Regards,
-- gotom




Reply to: