Bug#212285: marked as done (libc apt-get upgrade bug)
Your message dated Wed, 24 Sep 2003 08:36:37 +0100
with message-id <1064388997.13239.86.camel@kc.cam.armlinux.org>
and subject line Bug#212285: libc apt-get upgrade bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Sep 2003 02:22:05 +0000
>From dmorris@metavize.com Mon Sep 22 21:21:52 2003
Return-path: <dmorris@metavize.com>
Received: from ts30p49.fiasj.net (smtp.fiasj.net) [208.232.76.49]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A1coJ-0007y1-00; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 21:21:52 -0500
Received: from metavize.com [63.107.13.100] by smtp.fiasj.net with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-7.15) id A097324602A6; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 19:31:51 -0700
Message-ID: <[🔎] 3F6FAE39.8010208@metavize.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 19:21:45 -0700
From: Dirk Morris <dmorris@metavize.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030727 Thunderbird/0.1
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: libc apt-get upgrade bug
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.1-16 or 2.6.2-7
When recently trying to upgrade my boxes I get a segfault during the
upgrade.
I'm trying to upgrade from
ii libc6 2.3.1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and
Timezone
ii libc6-dev 2.3.1-16 GNU C Library: Development Libraries
and Hea
to libc6 2.3.1-16
The output:
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages have been kept back
base-config debconf
38 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded.
2 packages not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0B/21.0MB of archives. After unpacking 1680kB will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
Preconfiguring packages ...
(Reading database ... 37077 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.1-16 (using .../libc6_2.3.2-7_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2-7_i386.deb
(--unpack):
dpkg: warning - old post-removal script killed by signal (Segmentation
fault)
dpkg: error while cleaning up:
subprocess pre-installation script killed by signal (Segmentation fault)
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2-7_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
This happens on two fairly similar systems.
echo "" > /val/lib/dpkg/info/libc6.postrm didnt do anything
set -x didnt change the output
other info:
ii apt 0.5.4 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii dpkg 1.10.10 Package maintenance system for Debian
ii dpkg-dev 1.10.10 Package building tools for Debian
Linux timmy 2.5.68 #4 Thu Sep 4 18:01:48 PDT 2003 i686 GNU/Linux
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/3.3.1/specs
Configured with: ../src/configure -v
--enable-languages=c,c++,java,f77,pascal,objc,ada,treelang --prefix=/usr
--mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info
--with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/3.3 --enable-shared
--with-system-zlib --enable-nls --without-included-gettext
--enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-debug
--enable-java-gc=boehm --enable-java-awt=xlib --enable-objc-gc i386-linux
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.3.1 20030626 (Debian prerelease)
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 6
model : 6
model name : AMD Athlon(tm) Processor
stepping : 2
cpu MHz : 1152.978
cache size : 256 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 1
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mca
cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse syscall mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow
bogomips : 2269.18
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 212285-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Sep 2003 07:36:52 +0000
>From pb@nexus.co.uk Wed Sep 24 02:36:47 2003
Return-path: <pb@nexus.co.uk>
Received: from mta03-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.43]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A24CZ-0003eC-00; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 02:36:43 -0500
Received: from kc.cam.armlinux.org ([81.96.69.239])
by mta03-svc.ntlworld.com
(InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with ESMTP
id <20030924073640.QOZL29289.mta03-svc.ntlworld.com@kc.cam.armlinux.org>;
Wed, 24 Sep 2003 08:36:40 +0100
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
by kc.cam.armlinux.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1A24CT-000481-00; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 08:36:37 +0100
Subject: Re: Bug#212285: libc apt-get upgrade bug
From: Philip Blundell <pb@nexus.co.uk>
To: Dirk Morris <dmorris@metavize.com>, 212285-done@bugs.debian.org
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 3F70757B.5040408@metavize.com>
References: <[🔎] 3F6FAE39.8010208@metavize.com>
<[🔎] 1064299860.7195.193.camel@kc.cam.armlinux.org>
<[🔎] 3F70757B.5040408@metavize.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1064388997.13239.86.camel@kc.cam.armlinux.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 08:36:37 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: 212285-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.2 required=4.0
tests=QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
> Actually this isnt a debian bug, it seems to be some kernel bug.
Okay. I'm closing this report.
p.
Reply to: