Bug#206522: marked as done (libc-udeb: maybe should not provide glibc-2.3.2-2)
Your message dated Tue, 26 Aug 2003 18:53:37 +0900
with message-id <80ptiskan2.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
and subject line Bug#206522: libc-udeb: maybe should not provide glibc-2.3.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Aug 2003 08:36:10 +0000
>From diablero@poindessous.com Thu Aug 21 03:36:08 2003
Return-path: <diablero@poindessous.com>
Received: from smtp8.wanadoo.fr (mwinf0101.wanadoo.fr) [193.252.22.30]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19pkvQ-0001IM-00; Thu, 21 Aug 2003 03:36:08 -0500
Received: from thomas (AMontsouris-108-1-16-84.w80-15.abo.wanadoo.fr [80.15.145.84])
by mwinf0101.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 1153AC00011F
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 21 Aug 2003 10:36:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by thomas (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 4CA6A13FCD; Thu, 21 Aug 2003 10:36:06 +0200 (CEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
From: thomas@poindessous.com
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: libc-udeb: maybe should not provide glibc-2.3.2-2
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.22
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 10:36:06 +0200
Message-Id: <[🔎] 20030821083606.4CA6A13FCD@thomas>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,NO_REAL_NAME
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: libc-udeb
Version: 2.3.2-2 (not installed)
Severity: normal
Hi, today I tried to update the package "locales"
$ sudo apt-get install -u -s locales
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
libc-udeb
The following NEW packages will be installed:
libc-udeb
The following packages will be upgraded
locales
1 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 64 not upgraded.
Inst libc-udeb (2.3.2-3 ftp.de.debian.org)
Inst locales [2.3.2-2] (2.3.2-3 Debian:unstable)
Conf libc-udeb (2.3.2-3 ftp.de.debian.org)
Conf locales (2.3.2-3 Debian:unstable)
My apt/sources.list looks like :
deb http://ftp.oleane.net/pub/debian/ unstable main non-free contrib
deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US unstable/non-US main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main contrib non-free
deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian unstable main/debian-installer
Maybe I'm missing something, should I use pinning for debian-installer ?
How could I have debian-installer in my sources.list without risking to
install some udeb in my system ?
Thanks for your help.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux thomas 2.4.21-3-k7 #1 Sun Jul 20 19:23:36 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 206522-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Aug 2003 09:54:03 +0000
>From gotom@debian.or.jp Tue Aug 26 04:53:48 2003
Return-path: <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.gr.jp) [218.44.239.73]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19raWB-0002Iq-00; Tue, 26 Aug 2003 04:53:39 -0500
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.jp [218.44.239.73])
by oris.opensource.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 23C1BC33C7; Tue, 26 Aug 2003 18:53:38 +0900 (JST)
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 18:53:37 +0900
Message-ID: <80ptiskan2.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
To: Thomas Poindessous <thomas@poindessous.com>,
206522-done@bugs.debian.org
Cc: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Subject: Re: Bug#206522: libc-udeb: maybe should not provide glibc-2.3.2-2
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20030825182919.GA22376@poindessous.com>
References: <[🔎] 20030821083606.4CA6A13FCD@thomas>
<[🔎] 807k56lcof.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
<[🔎] 20030825182919.GA22376@poindessous.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 206522-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-13.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
At Mon, 25 Aug 2003 20:29:19 +0200,
Thomas Poindessous wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 10:10:40AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> >
> > I don't touch debian-installer yet, but I guess your apt-line has no
> > libc6 information? Instead of libc6, apt-get try to provides
> > glibc-2.3.2-3 using libc-udeb. Please confirm it.
>
> Yes, it does that.
>
> > > How could I have debian-installer in my sources.list without risking to
> > > install some udeb in my system ?
> >
> > I recommend you to hear about this issue on debian-boot or d-i related
> > lists.
>
> In fact, I did some tests and I don't need to have the debian-installer
> line in my sources.list to do some devel for debian-installer. My
> mistake.
>
> You can close this bug, if you want. I don't think anymore that is a
> problem.
OK, so I close this bug.
Regards,
-- gotom
Reply to: