Bug#206950: marked as done (upgrade failure, cannot replace ld.so)
Your message dated Sun, 24 Aug 2003 10:33:54 -0400
with message-id <20030824143354.GA22004@dragon.kitenet.net>
and subject line Bug#206950: upgrade failure, cannot replace ld.so
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Aug 2003 02:14:24 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Sat Aug 23 21:14:22 2003
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19qkOc-0005pt-00; Sat, 23 Aug 2003 21:14:22 -0500
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (pm3naxs3-137.access.naxs.com [216.98.91.137])
(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9265A17F30
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 24 Aug 2003 02:14:20 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from joey by dragon.kitenet.net with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 19qkQi-0004bM-00
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 23 Aug 2003 22:16:32 -0400
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 22:16:31 -0400
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: upgrade failure, cannot replace ld.so
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20030824021631.GA17571@dragon.kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.22
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Joey Hess <joey@dragon.kitenet.net>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-14.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2-3
Severity: grave
(Reading database ... 144697 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.2-2 (using .../libc6_2.3.2-3_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2-3_i386.deb (--un=
pack):
unable to install new version of `./lib/ld-2.3.2.so': Device or resource b=
usy
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2-3_i386.deb
At least my linker still works.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux dragon 2.4.21 #1 Fri Jun 13 21:33:56 EDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=3DC, LC_CTYPE=3DC
Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7 The Berkeley database routines=
[gl
-- no debconf information
ii dpkg 1.10.10 Package maintenance system for Debian
--=20
see shy jo
--Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/SB//3xwsXJZQhyMRAiSfAKCQV4xyR02x+HeqBasV6xbpC57DxgCcDak+
r27LmoEmgXeE2IFf3e7pINs=
=B+eN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 206950-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Aug 2003 14:32:04 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Sun Aug 24 09:32:01 2003
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19qvuS-0006Bp-00; Sun, 24 Aug 2003 09:32:00 -0500
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (pm3naxs3-137.access.naxs.com [216.98.91.137])
(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 1CBAE17F36; Sun, 24 Aug 2003 14:31:59 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from joey by dragon.kitenet.net with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 19qvwI-0005pO-00; Sun, 24 Aug 2003 10:33:54 -0400
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 10:33:54 -0400
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
Cc: 206950-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#206950: upgrade failure, cannot replace ld.so
Message-ID: <20030824143354.GA22004@dragon.kitenet.net>
References: <[🔎] 20030824055546.GA27612@azure.humbug.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20030824055546.GA27612@azure.humbug.org.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Joey Hess <joey@dragon.kitenet.net>
Delivered-To: 206950-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-21.8 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,
QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
> > dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2-3_i386.deb (=
--unpack):
> > unable to install new version of `./lib/ld-2.3.2.so': Device or resour=
ce busy
> > dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
>=20
> This looks very similar to the sort of errors you get when you have
> lsb-dev installed; it's a result of having the file that dpkg wants to
> replace bind mounted somewhere else. (And it's a bug in lsb-dev, if that
> is what's happening)
Thanks for the hint, it's bug #179986.
--=20
see shy jo
--mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/SMzS3xwsXJZQhyMRAl/EAJ0d1A7PmUVfjFhhdem/OKX1Bit0SwCfeyVO
UnrrPDotdajO/KjeOxKzKR8=
=8BZd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+--
Reply to: