Bug#184048: [m68k] binutils testsuite failures built in a glibc-2.3.1 environment
Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de> writes:
|> but fewer testcases as well ...
|>
|> FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (non PIC, load offset)
|> FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (PIC main, non PIC so)
|> FAIL: visibility (protected_undef_def) (non PIC, load offset)
|>
|> these three did pass with glibc-2.3.1 and glibc-2.2.3, the second one
|> did pass with glibc-2.3.1, but not with glibc-2.2.3.
|>
|> Andreas, do we need to care about these failures?
Non-PIC DSOs are generally not something you should use, so this is low
priority. But it is still worth fixing.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
Reply to: