Bug#184048: [m68k] binutils testsuite failures built in a glibc-2.3.1 environment

[GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>]

Hi Matthias,

At Sun, 9 Mar 2003 08:26:52 +0100,
Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: libc6-dev
> Version: 2.3.1
> Severity: grave
> 
> Attached is a diff of a binutils built in unstable with gcc-2.95 and
> one built on yesterday's testing (still glibc-2.2.5). Although I
> cannot prove that other build depedencies of binutils are the cause of
> this failures, I start with glibc as the moist obvious one ...

I recompiled binutils 2.14.90.0.5-0.2 on m68k with my test built glibc
2.3.1-1 (2003-07-08 cvs) + gcc 2.95.

The result is:

	Test Run By root on Wed Aug  6 11:18:45 2003
	Native configuration is m68k-unknown-linux-gnu
	
	                === binutils tests ===
	
	...
	                === binutils Summary ===
	
	# of expected passes            32
	
	                === gas Summary ===
	
	# of expected passes            66
	
	                === ld tests ===
	
	UNTESTED: cdtest
	UNTESTED: cdtest with -Ur
	
	PASS: visibility (hidden_weak) (non PIC)
	FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (non PIC, load offset)
	PASS: visibility (hidden_weak)
	FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (PIC main, non PIC so)
	PASS: visibility (hidden_weak) (PIC main)
	
	PASS: visibility (protected_undef_def) (non PIC)
	FAIL: visibility (protected_undef_def) (non PIC, load offset)
	PASS: visibility (protected_undef_def)
	PASS: visibility (protected_undef_def) (PIC main, non PIC so)
	PASS: visibility (protected_undef_def) (PIC main)
	
	UNTESTED: selective1
	UNTESTED: selective2
	UNTESTED: selective3
	UNTESTED: selective4
	UNTESTED: selective5
	UNTESTED: selective6
	
	UNTESTED: S-records with constructors
	
	                === ld Summary ===
	
	# of expected passes            172
	# of unexpected failures        3
	# of untested testcases         9


I don't know number of unexpected failures or untested testcases in ld
summary is acceptable or not.  How to act for this bug report?

Regards,
-- gotom