Re: 2.3.2-1
At Mon, 12 May 2003 12:58:27 -0400,
Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> > > Well, this seems an idea, but still many bugs are remained in BTS.
> > > Debian glibc stores up many bugs.
> >
> > So what? As long as they're known to be fixed by 2.3.2, what's the
> > big deal? Stalling all of sarge for the sake of closing a bunch of
> > bugs in one package seems like a stunningly pyrrhic victory to me.
> >
>
> It's not always _bugs_ that we're fighting. It's full out development.
> Architectures not supported upstream have active development being
> done within Debian/Others, which unfortuantely takes a lot of testing
> and time.
I agree. I believe sarge adopt 2.3.2, unless sarge is released within
a month. I think 2.3.2-1 provides much tests for such minor
architectures.
Regards,
-- gotom
Reply to:
- References:
- 2.3.2-1
- From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
- Re: 2.3.2-1
- From: James Troup <james@nocrew.org>
- Re: 2.3.2-1
- From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
- Re: 2.3.2-1
- From: James Troup <james@nocrew.org>
- Re: 2.3.2-1
- From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@baldric.uwo.ca>