[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#185373: marked as done (missing TCFLSH ioctl)



Your message dated Thu, 3 Apr 2003 13:37:08 +0200
with message-id <20030403113708.GB19485@aragorn>
and subject line Bug#185373: missing TCFLSH ioctl
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Mar 2003 00:41:53 +0000
>From rmh@khazad.dyndns.org Tue Mar 18 18:41:53 2003
Return-path: <rmh@khazad.dyndns.org>
Received: from 80-24-13-86.uc.nombres.ttd.es (getyouriso.dyndns.org) [80.24.13.86] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18vReS-0003js-00; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 18:41:53 -0600
Received: from aragorn ([192.168.0.3])
	by getyouriso.dyndns.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18vT8G-0004Hd-00; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 03:16:44 +0100
Received: from rmh by aragorn with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18vRdl-00008d-00; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 01:41:09 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Millan <rmh@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: missing TCFLSH ioctl
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 01:41:09 +0100
Message-Id: <E18vRdl-00008d-00@aragorn>
Sender: Robert Millan <rmh@khazad.dyndns.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0
	tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libc0.3-dev
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-03-19
Severity: normal

the TCFLSH ioctl is not defined in <sys/ioctl.h>

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux aragorn 2.2.22 #1 dl nov 25 21:59:43 CET 2002 i586
Locale: LANG=ca_ES.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES@euro (ignored: LC_ALL set)


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 185373-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2003 11:37:56 +0000
>From rmh@khazad.dyndns.org Thu Apr 03 05:37:56 2003
Return-path: <rmh@khazad.dyndns.org>
Received: from 80-24-13-86.uc.nombres.ttd.es (getyouriso.dyndns.org) [80.24.13.86] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 19132Z-0001rB-00; Thu, 03 Apr 2003 05:37:55 -0600
Received: from aragorn ([192.168.0.3])
	by getyouriso.dyndns.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1914Z8-0002sn-00; Thu, 03 Apr 2003 15:15:38 +0200
Received: from rmh by aragorn with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 19131o-0001tK-00; Thu, 03 Apr 2003 13:37:08 +0200
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 13:37:08 +0200
From: Robert Millan <zeratul2@wanadoo.es>
To: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Cc: 185373-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#185373: missing TCFLSH ioctl
Message-ID: <20030403113708.GB19485@aragorn>
References: <E18vRdl-00008d-00@aragorn> <801y13mmg3.wl@oris.opensource.jp> <20030319193558.GA402@aragorn> <80u1diplnm.wl@oris.opensource.jp> <20030403010954.GA503@aragorn> <80istvq2gs.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <80istvq2gs.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
Organisation: free as in freedom
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
Sender: Robert Millan <rmh@khazad.dyndns.org>
Delivered-To: 185373-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.1 required=4.0
	tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
	      SIGNATURE_SHORT_SPARSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
	      USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 07:50:43PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> 
> "might not"?
> 
> It seems that Hurd does not conform to sysv style _TCFLSH 0x5407.

Note that we're talking about Glibc, or at most Glibc in combination
with the Hurd. (nevertheless, if you want to assign hurd-related
Glibc bugs to the hurd-dev package that's ok)

> I
> think TIOCFLUSH is BSD's ioctl() interface argument number, and TCFLSH
> is linux (sysv)'s ioctl() interface argument number. Try to use
> tcflush().  I think it's ok that Hurd does not have any TCFLSH, but
> have tcflush().  Your program is needed to fix.  I can say this bug
> can be closed, ok?

aha, i see. then i think it's ok to close..

-- 
Robert Millan

make: *** No rule to make target `war'.  Stop.

Another world is possible - Just say no to genocide



Reply to: