Bug#185373: missing TCFLSH ioctl

[GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>]

At Thu, 3 Apr 2003 03:09:54 +0200,
Robert Millan wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 07:17:01PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > I don't know well, but TIOCFLUSH is not appropriate?
> > > 
> > > yes it is (i just tried it after sending this report)
> > 
> > Could you tell your results?
> 
> I can tell that TIOCFLUSH solved the situation since the program i
> was trying to build had support for both ioctl's. but other programs
> might not.. shouldn't we have both?

"might not"?

It seems that Hurd does not conform to sysv style _TCFLSH 0x5407.  I
think TIOCFLUSH is BSD's ioctl() interface argument number, and TCFLSH
is linux (sysv)'s ioctl() interface argument number.  Try to use
tcflush().  I think it's ok that Hurd does not have any TCFLSH, but
have tcflush().  Your program is needed to fix.  I can say this bug
can be closed, ok?

Regards,
-- gotom