[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#183477: libc6's conflict against php4 is pretty much bogus and useless



At Wed, 5 Mar 2003 07:03:57 -0800,
Jeff Bailey wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 05:32:28PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> 
> > I don't know why this conflict was introduced.  It might be related
> > with __libc_fork bug (see #170385).  However, I introduced the patch
> > to fix __libc_fork issue, so I think this conflicts becomes
> > meaningless nowadays.
> 
> > Jeff Bailey might know about it in detail.  Jeff, could I remove
> > conflicts: php4 and wine?
> 
> I don't remember off hand about the php4 conflict.  I'd like to see us
> maintain the wine conflict because we will probably need to get rid of
> the patch eventually and the conflict will be accurate then.  The php4
> thing might be the same way.  I can look it up a bit later if noone else
> comments.

"The versions of php4 in stable and testing (4:4.1.2-X) don't exhibit
this problem" is brought by glibc's __libc_fork ad-hoc patch.  Broken
usage of __libc_fork in php4 and wine should be fixed in sarge
completely.

Well, removing the patch about __libc_fork is after releasing sarge,
and I agree we have to conflict it at the last.  So I change my mind
that it should keep to conflict.

Adam, is it OK?

Regards,
-- gotom





Reply to: