[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: 2.3.1-14



On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 12:51:04AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> Yes, /bin/sh example makes sense.  Binaries contained in bash and
> libc6 and sysvinit should exist at the same time.  This bootstraping
> problem lies all over the essential packages.

Yup.

> BTW, postinst has another file-rc checking:
>     check="$check inetd"
>     rl=$(runlevel | awk '{print $2}')
>     for service in $check; do
>         if [ -f /usr/share/file-rc/rc -a -f /etc/runlevel.conf ]; then
>             idl=$(filerc $rl $service)
>         else
>             idl=$(ls /etc/rc${rl}.d/S??${service} 2> /dev/null | head -1)
>         fi
> This place is changed simply as checking -f /usr/{share,lib}/file-rc/rc.

Yick. You might be able to use invoke-rc.d here instead? You'll probably
end up with circular dependencies on upgrades then though :(

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

  ``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations -- 
        you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''

Attachment: pgpt06U0IAAZK.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: