Re: Bug#165699: progress on the glibc 2.3 / php4 issues
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 02:02:38PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 11:50:23AM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 12:49:56PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > > I've made some progress into figuring out the source of the glibc 2.3,
> > > apache, php4, php4-imap segfaults. I suspect that php4 and openssl are
> > > ultimately at fault (at least, a change with regards to these two
> > > packages seems to correct the error), but I'm not certain, so I'm
> > > sending a follow-up to the bug report to get feedback before reassigning
> > > back to PHP4.
>
> > Wow. If it does turn out to be a php4 problem, aj has told me that it's
> > okay to fill our conflicts lines with other packages so whoever winds up
> > with this bug, please make sure that debian-glibc@lists.debian.org knows
> > which version to conflict against.
>
> If no one on the glibc side can point to a bug in glibc 2.3 that would
> have caused the libcrypto dependency to suddenly become a problem, then
> I imagine this is what we'll do. I'm still curious to know what changed
> between 2.2 and 2.3, so if anyone has any ideas...
I'm exceedingly suspicious here; it would be nice to figure out if this
is a bug of the dynamic linker, since that seems likely from your
description.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Reply to: