Re: libexec in glibc

[ams@kemisten.nu (Alfred M. Szmidt)]

tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:

> 1) What gets added to the FHS is not a Debian decision,
> 2) Debian released architectures need to conform to FHS, and
> 3) Ports still being worked on don't need to treat (2) as their top
>    priority, especially when they expect FHS will change in relevant
>    ways before the port is released.

If top-level directories are allowed to be added by the people that
make a distribution then the whole discussion is quite irrelevant.

I will ask about this on the FHS lists..

Cheers,
-- 
Alfred M. Szmidt