Re: Glibc 2.3 pre-releases
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 12:09:07PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> There are two cases where people have been trying to add R_*_NONE
> workarounds to glibc. That looks like it's handling PLT relocations
> rather than general relocations, which means that almost certainly a
> PLT entry was not emitted that should have been. I think I know
> why; give me a day or two to check if the problem I found also
> affects M68K. I'll post the ARM patch also.
We've had a few cases of (as Roland McGrath put it) "Over eager PLT
reduction". Upstream has been reasonably friendly about it.
tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
At last you cry out in anguish: "Why me?"
God answers: "Why not?"
- Sheldon Kopp
Reply to: