Re: Glibc 2.3
**Adding doko to the cc: list**
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:36:36AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > Should I upload [glibc 2.2.91] to experimental, or should I just
> > > post them in people.d.o/~jbailey/?
> > For now I strongly suggest just keeping the packages private for
> > testing. Especially do not upload them to experimental. Having
> > them out for public consumption is a bad bad idea.
> > Once Drepper releases 2.2.90, we can make packages based on that,
> > run it through its test suite for all arch's, and decide on when
> > to upload it to unstable.
It just happened on about the timeframe I guess it was going to. =)
I'll be doing up the test version this weekend.
So we run the compile and testsuites ourselves on all of the boxes, or
do we ask the porters to help us on this?
> Seconded. Is there any advantage to coordinating this with the GCC
> 3.2 transition?
I had been talking about this with Matthias Klose - I think yes, since
this glibc requires gcc 3.2. I want to take some time (again, this
weekend, I'm just back from vacation so am a little backlogged) to try
and write up a unified plan for a gcc/glibc transition.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
I reincarnated for this?
Reply to: