Re: glibc on woody cvs?
> Hi,
>
> What do you think to maintain woody's glibc on debian glibc cvs?
> We simply do that the branch for woody derives from the first cvs
> image, and 2.2.5-11.1 is committed.
>
> This merit is: we can maintain woody's glibc debs on cvs, similar to
> sarge/sid. In case we get RC bugs, we can easily reflect fix for not
> only sarge/sid but also woody. How do you feel this proposal?
>
> -- gotom
>
Sounds like a great idea! I'm actively using the glibc cvs
to keep changes up to date... this would make things even
easier :)
c.
Reply to: