Re: libX11 is borked (or is it glibc ?)
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 05:37:34PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> Ben Collins wrote:
> > Not everything has to be recompiled. Just libs that use obsolete symbols
> > (ones that have changed to weak symbols for compatibility, but now have
> > newer versions of that symbol). We had this same issue with the 2.0.7 ->
> > 2.1.0 upgrade. It was actually a lot more extensive than this upgrade.
>
> Can you get a list of such symbols so we can somehow grep up a list of
> libraries that need to be recompiled?
So far, there are no libraries that need rebuilding now. The original
reporter of this bug says he was accidentally using a CVS binutils, and it
works fine with the woody binutils.
--
-----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` bcollins@debian.org -- bcollins@openldap.org -- bcollins@linux.com '
`---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
Reply to: