Bug#32801: glibc-doc not upgraded, at least recommended by libc6-dev

To: Yamamoto Hirotaka <ymmt@is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>, 32801@bugs.debian.org, control@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#32801: glibc-doc not upgraded, at least recommended by libc6-dev
From: Wichert Akkerman <wakkerma@cs.leidenuniv.nl>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 17:12:53 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 19990203171253.A1309@cs.leidenuniv.nl>
Reply-to: Wichert Akkerman <wakkerma@cs.leidenuniv.nl>, 32801@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] vkryamfps23.fsf@harp.is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>; from Yamamoto Hirotaka on Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 09:53:08PM +0900
References: <[🔎] vkryamfps23.fsf@harp.is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>

severity 32801 normal
thanks

Previously Yamamoto Hirotaka wrote:
> I suggest that at least libc6-dev package should recommend
> glibc-doc because developers would want both.

While I agree that would be nice, this is hardly important or release-critical.

Wichert.

-- 
==============================================================================
This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman.
E-Mail: wakkerma@cs.leidenuniv.nl
WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Processed: Re: Bug#32801: glibc-doc not upgraded, at least recommended by libc6-dev
  - From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
- Bug#32801: glibc-doc not upgraded, at least recommended by libc6-dev
  - From: Yamamoto Hirotaka <ymmt@is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>

References:
- Bug#32801: glibc-doc not upgraded, at least recommended by libc6-dev
  - From: Yamamoto Hirotaka <ymmt@is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>

Prev by Date: Bug#32801: glibc-doc not upgraded, at least recommended by libc6-dev
Next by Date: Processed: Re: Bug#32801: glibc-doc not upgraded, at least recommended by libc6-dev
Previous by thread: Bug#32801: glibc-doc not upgraded, at least recommended by libc6-dev
Next by thread: Processed: Re: Bug#32801: glibc-doc not upgraded, at least recommended by libc6-dev
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread