[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Python 3.9 for bullseye

On 10/18/20 12:13 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Python 3.9 as a supported Python3 version is now in unstable, and all binNMUs
> are done (thanks to Graham for the work).   Bug reports should be all filed for
> all known problems [1], and the current state of the 3.9 addition can be seen at
> [2] (a few of the "bad" are false packages with b-d n python3-all-dev, but not
> building for 3.9, bug reports also filed).
> The major outstanding issue is the pandas stack, all other problems are found in
> leaf packages (leaf in the sense of that no other package for the 3.9 addition
> is blocked).
> Please help fixing the remaining issues!
> Matthias
> [1]
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=python3.9;users=debian-python@lists.debian.org
> [2] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python3.9.html

Going on with a test rebuild of 3.9 as default to file bug reports for more
packages.  The first stage1 packages for 3.9 as default [1] can be found at

  deb [trusted=yes] http://people.debian.org/~doko/tmp/python3.9 ./
  deb [trusted=yes] http://people.debian.org/~ginggs/python3.9-repo ./

The first repo just having the python3-defaults packages from experimental. The
second repo of course will be outdated very soon ...  Bug reports for stage1 are
filed, Graham is now running the test builds for stage2.

The autopkg test results at [2] need checking. There's currently a britney bug
which marks things as bad, and only gets it right after a week. Plus there's no
way to select an "unrelated" package from unstable for a test, and have it
marked as a successful test.  So basically you need to wait until all the 3.9
related fixes migrate to testing for running a successful autopkg test.


[1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python3.9-default.html
[2] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/python3-defaults

Reply to: