Re: Bullseye development cycle (source-only uploads & python2 removal)
Dear Sebastiaan,
Il 21/07/19 15:40, Sebastiaan Couwenberg ha scritto:
> On 7/21/19 1:26 PM, Antonio Valentino wrote:
>> Il 21/07/19 13:09, Sebastiaan Couwenberg ha scritto:
>>> The biggest blockers are mipp & python-mpop which are python2-only
>>> currently.
>>>
>>> I've pushed a change to use python3 for mipp, but that's incomplete. A
>>> bunch of test fail due to UTF8 being the default in Python 3. That's
>>> not really something I want dive into further.
>>>
>>> How important are these two packages?
>>>
>>> Removing them from testing may be an option to unblock their
>>> dependencies. They keep python-pyresample in the archive for example,
>>> which in turn requires python-pyproj, and its upstream is going to drop
>>> Python 2 support.
>>
>> Both mipp and python-mpop are no longer actively developed upstream,
>> they have been replaced by satpy that now is in debian.
>> For this reason, together with the fact that they are python2 only, the
>> idea is to drop them both from debian.
>>
>> I'm currently checking reverse dependencies to clean them.
>
> There aren't any other than the blends task AFAIK, I just dropped them
> from the remotesensing task.
>
> They only depend on each other.
>
> Will you file the RM bugreports for these packages?
yes, just submited:
* https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932647
* https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932648
kind regards
--
Antonio Valentino
Reply to: