[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GEOS 3.6.2



On 01/27/2018 08:05 AM, Ross Gammon wrote:
> On 01/26/2018 08:11 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 12/28/2017 02:02 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> ossim (2.2.0-1) and otb (6.2.0+dfsg-2) have been uploaded to unstable in
>>> preparation of the geos transition.
>>>
>>> grass (7.2.2-2) has also been uploaded to unstable, to no longer link to
>>> the GEOS C++ library which it doesn't use.
>>>
>>> ossim is the only remaining package which depends on the libgeos-3.5.1,
>>> so instead of a transition I've uploaded geos (3.6.2-1) to unstable and
>>> requested an NMU for ossim (#885601).
>>
>> If people care about getting GEOS 3.6.2 into Ubuntu bionic, they need to
>> prod the Ubuntu developers to update the shark package to 3.1.4+ds1-1.
>> Ubuntu has diverged from Debian by applying Ubuntu specific changes
>> which block autosync from Debian. [0]
>>
>> shark (3.1.4+ds1-1) is required to build OTB successfully with GCC 7.
>> otb (6.2.0+dfsg-2) is stuck in proposed because it FTBFS due to assuming
>> shark supports GCC 7 now, as it does in Debian. The patches in otb
>> (6.2.0+dfsg-2) are required to build successfully with OSSIM 2.2.0.
>>
>> ossim (2.2.1-1) is still in proposed because britney is waiting for
>> autopkgtest results [1]. The missing otb builds are likely to block
>> migration of ossim (2.2.1-1) too.
>>
>> [0] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shark
>> [1]
>> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/bionic/update_excuses.html#ossim
> 
> Shark 3.1.4+ds1-1ubuntu1 was uploaded last night, and is waiting for
> autopkgtests.
> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/bionic/update_excuses.html#shark

Shark 3.1.4 also migrated to released, now otb needs to be rebuilt with
shark 3.1.4.

Kind Regards,

Bas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: