On 01/26/2018 08:11 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 12/28/2017 02:02 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> ossim (2.2.0-1) and otb (6.2.0+dfsg-2) have been uploaded to unstable in >> preparation of the geos transition. >> >> grass (7.2.2-2) has also been uploaded to unstable, to no longer link to >> the GEOS C++ library which it doesn't use. >> >> ossim is the only remaining package which depends on the libgeos-3.5.1, >> so instead of a transition I've uploaded geos (3.6.2-1) to unstable and >> requested an NMU for ossim (#885601). > > If people care about getting GEOS 3.6.2 into Ubuntu bionic, they need to > prod the Ubuntu developers to update the shark package to 3.1.4+ds1-1. > Ubuntu has diverged from Debian by applying Ubuntu specific changes > which block autosync from Debian. [0] > > shark (3.1.4+ds1-1) is required to build OTB successfully with GCC 7. > otb (6.2.0+dfsg-2) is stuck in proposed because it FTBFS due to assuming > shark supports GCC 7 now, as it does in Debian. The patches in otb > (6.2.0+dfsg-2) are required to build successfully with OSSIM 2.2.0. > > ossim (2.2.1-1) is still in proposed because britney is waiting for > autopkgtest results [1]. The missing otb builds are likely to block > migration of ossim (2.2.1-1) too. > > [0] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shark > [1] > http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/bionic/update_excuses.html#ossim > > Kind Regards, > > Bas > Shark 3.1.4+ds1-1ubuntu1 was uploaded last night, and is waiting for autopkgtests. http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/bionic/update_excuses.html#shark
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature