Re: pycsw 2.0.1
On 09/12/2016 02:45 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> Hi Angelos,
>
> On 09/12/2016 10:42 AM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
>> On 09/12/2016 11:08 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> On 09/09/2016 10:34 AM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
>>>> On 09/09/2016 11:32 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>>>> Hi Johan & Angelos,
>>>>>
>>>>> Seeing that pycsw 2.0.1 has been released, will either of you update
>>>>> the
>>>>> package before the end of the weekend or shall I?
>>>>>
>>>>> The changes are trivial, so I'd rather not wait to update the
>>>>> package to
>>>>> the latest upstream release.
>>>> I will update the package this weekend.
>>> Seeing that pycsw hasn't been updated yet, shall I update the package
>>> after all?
>>
>> Busy weekend, will update it now.
>
> Thanks for your work on pycsw. I've push a few changes to document the
> patch removal and to refresh the remaining patches.
>
> Quite a few tests fail, that may warrant investigation.
>
> If you're happy with the package, please set the distribution in the
> changelog to unstable, and I will sponsor the upload. Or Johan can do it
> if he has time (please let me know if you'll upload it).
The test failures seem to be caused by not having network in the
cowbuilder chroots to conform with the Debian Policy which disallows
targets in debian/rules from relying on network access.
We should find a more gentle way to skip tests that rely on network
access for the Debian package other than renaming the XML files to have
them skipped. Maybe limit the suites to those that don't rely on
external services? Do you have any suggestions?
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
Reply to: