Re: SAGA 2.2.6

[Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl>]

On 04/01/2016 11:58 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg
> <sebastic@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> 
>> Because the package will have to pass the NEW queue for saga-common, now
>> is a good time to split libsaga into separate packages matching the
>> SONAME (libsaga-api-2.2.6 & libsaga-gdi-2.2.6). Because the upstream
>> version is part of the package name then, you don't need to saga-depends
>> helper and virtual libsaga-2.2.6 package any more.
>>
>> Do you want to split the library package or rather keep them bundled in
>> libsaga for now?
>
> I was planning to split them, because I don't really like the
> saga-depends helper.

It does mean that the library package names change for every new
upstream release, requiring the package to pass NEW and having the
upload sponsored. That may be a bit too much of an inconvenience.

> I've found a smallish license problem, reported upstream:
> https://sourceforge.net/p/saga-gis/bugs/226/
> 
> Before uploading I'd like have an answer on that.

Good catch. I've subscribed to that issue too.

Kind regards,

Bas

-- 
 GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1