Re: SAGA 2.2.6

[Johan Van de Wauw <johan.vandewauw@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg
<sebastic@xs4all.nl> wrote:

> Because the package will have to pass the NEW queue for saga-common, now
> is a good time to split libsaga into separate packages matching the
> SONAME (libsaga-api-2.2.6 & libsaga-gdi-2.2.6). Because the upstream
> version is part of the package name then, you don't need to saga-depends
> helper and virtual libsaga-2.2.6 package any more.
>
> Do you want to split the library package or rather keep them bundled in
> libsaga for now?
I was planning to split them, because I don't really like the
saga-depends helper.

I've found a smallish license problem, reported upstream:
https://sourceforge.net/p/saga-gis/bugs/226/

Before uploading I'd like have an answer on that.

Kind Regards,
Johan