[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: OTB packaging



Hi Andreas, Rashad,
thanks for your work.

Il 07/10/2014 15:59, Rashad M ha scritto:

>     I pulled your changes and recommited a slightly adapted patch about the
>     spelling.  Remark:  I usually do not care that much about spelling but
>     it was bloating the lintian output drastically enough to become a
>     nuisance (and is not finished yet).  Please forward the current patch
>     to upstream to let us get rid of this.  Thanks.

Rahsad, any objection to push the patches upstream?

>     E: libotb: embedded-library usr/lib/otb/libotbopenjpeg.so.1111.1.0: openjpeg
>     E: libotb: embedded-library usr/lib/otb/libotbtinyXML.so.4.2.1: tinyxml
> 
>     The best thing would be to link against Debian packaged libopenjpeg and
>     libtinyxml.  If this is not possible since these might be changed
>     library versions than we need at least override this and document the
>     problem.  Could you please clarify with upstream whether it is possible
>     to link against the Debian packaged library?
> 
> 
> Debian packaged version of tinyXML lib is possible to link against otb.
> cmake -DOTB_USE_EXTERNAL_TINYXML=ON
> -D TINYXML_INCLUDE_DIR=
> -DTINYXML_LIBRARY=
> 
> this will enable external tinyxml

Good to know - could this be pushed upstream also, to keep things cleaner?

>  OpenJPEG in the utilities/otbopenjpeg is no longer maintained. Instead openjpeg via
> gdal is used.
> internal version of otbopenjpeg is kept for people who need JPEG200 support and dont
> want to build gdal or have a gdal without openjpeg support.
> 
> So you have two options.
> 
> 1. build GDAL with openjpeg (I would prefer this). This makes no change in OTB build
> 2. disable openjpeg OTB_USE_JPEG2000=OFF

#1 seems better in fact. I suppose this would involve rebuilding the whole toolchain
based on GDAL, or is this compiled as a plugin?

All the best.
-- 
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
Corsi QGIS e PostGIS: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html


Reply to: