Re: [DebianGIS] grass62?
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 11:01:27AM +1300, Hamish wrote:
> Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > We should probably resume for lenny a grass-cvs source package to stay
> > on the edge with latest not-so-stable release with a fast development
> > cycle. That is/was commonly done for package difficult to test
> > extensivly with confidence...
>
> I don't mind a grass-cvs package in experimental, but for lenny I think
> it should be from the 6.2.x line. (At least for the next 12-18 months;
> depends on how long lenny will take....)
>
Well I would move 6.0 -> 6.2 for lenny. Does it have sense to maintain
a 6.0 branch after etch? My own idea is having a stable and a
not-so-stable branch for grass both available in testing and than lenny.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
Reply to: