Re: [DebianGIS] uploading gdal
If we put this patch in the debian/patches directory
aren't we ready to go with the commit to debian
unstable?
If there is more to do please let me know.
Thanks
Jon
--- Francesco Paolo Lovergine <frankie@debian.org>
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 12:09:42PM -0500, Steve
> Halasz wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 17:46 +0100, Francesco P.
> Lovergine wrote:
> > > Another week is passed without novelties.
> > > I'm going to upload the new package within the
> end of the week
> > > if none has something to say NOW.
> > >
> >
>
> Missed the patch, sorry...
>
> --- GDALmake.opt.in.old 2005-09-30
> 06:52:58.000000000 +0200
> +++ GDALmake.opt.in 2006-01-20 16:25:46.000000000
> +0100
> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@
> -I$(GDAL_ROOT)/ogr
> -I$(GDAL_ROOT)/ogr/ogrsf_frmts
>
> # libtool targets and help variables
> -LIBGDAL := $(GDAL_ROOT)/libgdal.la
> +LIBGDAL := $(GDAL_ROOT)/libgdal1.3.1.la
> LIBGDAL_CURRENT := 10
> LIBGDAL_REVISION := 0
> LIBGDAL_AGE := 9
> @@ -111,9 +111,9 @@
> # native build targets and variables
> GDAL_VER = @GDAL_VER@
>
> -GDAL_LIB = $(GDAL_ROOT)/libgdal.a
> -GDAL_SLIB = $(GDAL_ROOT)/libgdal.$(SO_EXT)
> -GDAL_SLIB_LINK = -L$(GDAL_ROOT) -lgdal
> +GDAL_LIB = $(GDAL_ROOT)/libgdal1.3.1.a
> +GDAL_SLIB = $(GDAL_ROOT)/libgdal1.3.1.$(SO_EXT)
> +GDAL_SLIB_LINK = -L$(GDAL_ROOT) -lgdal1.3.1
>
> #
> # OGR/PostgreSQL support.
> @@ -258,14 +258,14 @@
>
> ifeq ($(HAVE_LIBTOOL), yes)
> CONFIG_LIBS = $(LIBGDAL)
> -CONFIG_LIBS_INS = -L$(INST_LIB) -lgdal
> +CONFIG_LIBS_INS = -L$(INST_LIB) -lgdal1.3.1
> EXE_DEP_LIBS = $(LIBGDAL)
> SO_EXT = la
> else
>
> ifeq ($(HAVE_LD_SHARED),yes)
> CONFIG_LIBS = $(GDAL_SLIB_LINK) $(LIBS)
> -CONFIG_LIBS_INS = -L$(INST_LIB) -lgdal
> +CONFIG_LIBS_INS = -L$(INST_LIB) -lgdal1.3.1
> EXE_DEP_LIBS = $(GDAL_SLIB)
> else
> CONFIG_LIBS = $(GDAL_LIBS) $(LIBS)
>
> --
> Francesco P. Lovergine
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pkg-grass-general mailing list
> Pkg-grass-general@lists.alioth.debian.org
>
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-general
>
Reply to: