Re: [Pkg-grass-general] libgdal-grass version
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 04:30:03PM -0400, Steve Halasz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm about to send libgdal-grass off to my sponsor for an upload to
> unstable. But I'm planning to package it as 1.2.3-0 instead of 1.2.5-0.
> The upstream tarball is versioned 1.2.3. I assume that 1.2.5 was chosen
> to mirror the gdal version and avoid confusion about whether
> libgdal-grass-1.2.3 could be used with gdal-1.2.5. But now gdal is at
> 1.2.6. So going backwards might play a little havoc down the road with
> debian-gis users versioning, but I think it's best. Any objections?
>
> Steve
>
Yes, upload would be refused automagically by debpool or dak.
Do you have any objection about using epoch?
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
Reply to: