Re: [Pkg-grass-general] update
> AFAICU, the stumbling block is the packaging of grass57, which would allow
> gdal and qgis support. Is that correct? How can we get out of this?
I really wonder how grass made it into testing when looking at the
following comment (See
%grass: i386 # maintainer still figuring out packaging, HUGE, and static linking only atm
This should be cleaned up ASAP, or we'll run into problems getting grass
plugins compiled for any platform except i386...