Re: gcc-10-source cross build for xtensa with D enabled fails due to missing texi macro. patch included
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 02:22:11PM +0000, Witold Baryluk wrote:
> So, it does appear that /usr/src/gcc-10/gcc-10.2.0-dfsg.tar.xz from
> gcc-10-source 10.2.1-6 ,
> doesn't have these patches applied. And the patches need to be applied
> manually after unpacking.
>
> /usr/src/gcc-10/debian/README.source provides some information, but it
> is a bit tricky:
>
> user@debian:~/xtensa-d/gcc-xtensa-lx106-8$ /usr/src/gcc-10/debian/rules patch
> /usr/src/gcc-10/debian/rules:21: debian/rules.patch: No such file or directory
> make: *** No rule to make target 'debian/rules.patch'. Stop.
> user@debian:~/xtensa-d/gcc-xtensa-lx106-8
>
> Try to call make -f without changing directory:
>
> user@debian:~/xtensa-d/gcc-xtensa-lx106-8$ make -f
> /usr/src/gcc-10/debian/rules.patch patch
> make: Nothing to be done for 'patch'.
> user@debian:~/xtensa-d/gcc-xtensa-lx106-8$
>
> But, I think this is simply because then debian/rules.patch runs
> without proper variables from rules.defs applied, and $(patch_stamp)
> is empty string.
>
> Not sure how to do all the patches, not that xtensa really need most
> of them. Just the gdc-texinfo.patch
I think the issue here is that I previously attempted to apply the
Debian patches, but at some point they stopped being a basic
debian_patches.txt file and turned into the current Makefile fragment
nightmare. And this wasn't noticed because they're not actually
necessary for the lx106 target.
Witold, I have no experience with D. I'm happy to enable it for the
gcc-xtensa-lx106 package but I'd feel a lot more comfortable doing so if
you could provide a basic sanity test to compile like the existing C
test in tests/compile-empty-lx106
J.
--
... Do you believe in happy endings?
Reply to: