Your message dated Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:39:38 +0000 with message-id <E1jGrGs-00071l-Ks@fasolo.debian.org> and subject line Bug#923982: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #882490, regarding gcc: Tune default --param ggc-min-expand for 32-bit arches to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 882490: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882490 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: mips/mipsel: enforce --param ggc-min-expand=10 in dpkg-buildflags
- From: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 13:59:01 +0100
- Message-id: <CA+7wUsxVhkGUW5PvymNc9D6Dc3aSWQZKpd-inqwfE=GKW9gMng@mail.gmail.com>
Package: dpkg Version: 1.19.0.4 User: debian-mips@lists.debian.org Usertags: mips mipsel It would be nice if the default CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS were updated on mips & mipsel (only) to include an additional gcc flag: `--param ggc-min-expand=10` This has caused multiple FTBFS in the past as for example: 849657 or 879636. See previous discussions on debian-mips@l.d.o: On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 1:14 PM, James Cowgill <jcowgill@debian.org> wrote: > On 23/11/17 11:42, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> YunQiang, >> >> Do you know of any drawbacks ? > > This has been raised before: > https://lists.debian.org/debian-mips/2016/10/msg00049.html > > I think it's generally a good idea. You wouldn't want to "enforce" this > - you would set it as an overridable default setting. > > I think the disadvantages are: compilation speed, I think there is no > official way to do this so you would have to hack the gcc source a bit, > and deviation from upstream / other distros.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 427108-done@bugs.debian.org,853709-done@bugs.debian.org,856274-done@bugs.debian.org,866369-done@bugs.debian.org,870375-done@bugs.debian.org,879703-done@bugs.debian.org,881288-done@bugs.debian.org,881939-done@bugs.debian.org,882490-done@bugs.debian.org,884431-done@bugs.debian.org,886099-done@bugs.debian.org,887453-done@bugs.debian.org,888394-done@bugs.debian.org,894302-done@bugs.debian.org,895452-done@bugs.debian.org,901836-done@bugs.debian.org,954830-done@bugs.debian.org,
- Cc: gcc-7@packages.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#923982: Removed package(s) from unstable
- From: Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:39:38 +0000
- Message-id: <E1jGrGs-00071l-Ks@fasolo.debian.org>
Version: 7.5.0-6+rm Dear submitter, as the package gcc-7 has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/923982 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---