[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gcc-doc-defaults_5_amd64.changes REJECTED



On 9 November 2013 20:48, Paul R. Tagliamonte <paultag@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hah, I accepted this; this raised an internal bug; can you please re-upload
> your last upload?
>
>

ACL dm: hijacks are not allowed (binary=gcc-doc-base, other-source=gcc-4.7-doc)

Doesn't it mean that such an upload needs to be sponsored by a DD ?

Regards,

Dmitrijs.


> On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 3:47 PM, GUO Yixuan <culu.gyx@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dear FTP Masters,
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 07:00:05PM +0000, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
>> >
>> > An exception was raised while processing the package:
>> > Traceback (most recent call last):
>> >   File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/process_policy.py", line 98,
>> > in wrapper
>> >     function(upload, srcqueue, comments, transaction)
>> >   File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/process_policy.py", line 155,
>> > in comment_accept
>> >     transaction.copy_binary(db_binary, suite,
>> > binary_component_func(db_binary), allow_tainted=allow_tainted,
>> > extra_archives=[upload.target_suite.archive])
>> >   File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/process_policy.py", line 136,
>> > in binary_component_func
>> >     .join(Component).one()
>> >   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/sqlalchemy/orm/query.py", line
>> > 2193, in one
>> >     "Multiple rows were found for one()")
>> > MultipleResultsFound: Multiple rows were found for one()
>> >
>> > Original comments:
>> >
>> >
>> > ===
>> >
>> > Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
>> > your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
>> > concerns.
>>
>> I wanted to move a binary package, gcc-doc-base, from src:gcc-4.7-doc
>> to src:gcc-doc-defaults, so this package contains a newer version of
>> gcc-doc-base, than the current one. (After this one got accepted, I'll
>> upload a new src:gcc-4.7-doc without gcc-doc-base.) Now there's
>> apparently some problems, could you help me with that?
>>
>> If there's some other way of moving binary packages between source
>> packages, please feel free to correct me.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> GUO Yixuan
>
>
>
>
> --
> :wq


Reply to: