[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gcc-doc-defaults_5_amd64.changes REJECTED



Hah, I accepted this; this raised an internal bug; can you please re-upload your last upload?


On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 3:47 PM, GUO Yixuan <culu.gyx@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear FTP Masters,

On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 07:00:05PM +0000, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
>
> An exception was raised while processing the package:
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/process_policy.py", line 98, in wrapper
>     function(upload, srcqueue, comments, transaction)
>   File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/process_policy.py", line 155, in comment_accept
>     transaction.copy_binary(db_binary, suite, binary_component_func(db_binary), allow_tainted=allow_tainted, extra_archives=[upload.target_suite.archive])
>   File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/process_policy.py", line 136, in binary_component_func
>     .join(Component).one()
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/sqlalchemy/orm/query.py", line 2193, in one
>     "Multiple rows were found for one()")
> MultipleResultsFound: Multiple rows were found for one()
>
> Original comments:
>
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
> concerns.

I wanted to move a binary package, gcc-doc-base, from src:gcc-4.7-doc
to src:gcc-doc-defaults, so this package contains a newer version of
gcc-doc-base, than the current one. (After this one got accepted, I'll
upload a new src:gcc-4.7-doc without gcc-doc-base.) Now there's
apparently some problems, could you help me with that?

If there's some other way of moving binary packages between source
packages, please feel free to correct me.

Best regards,

GUO Yixuan



--
:wq

Reply to: