[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)

On Tue, May  8, 2012 at 18:55:49 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:

> strigi was fixed, the gnome-commander and hugin builds were both tried on
> brahms (and did succeed on other architectures).
Other architectures didn't switch to 4.7.

> > What's worse is that at least for the last two, there were no gcc 4.7 bug
> > reports for them! And don't tell me thins changed for them, since hugin is
> > getting his *fourth* binNMU in a row.
> no, because it's a buildd issue, or an gmp issue, afaics. Again, please don't
> blame the compiler if you can't explain a build failure.
No it ain't.

> so what is the status of brahms?
It's happy since it reverted to gmp 5.0.4.  Less so since it upgraded
gcc to 4.7.

> > You're making our job difficult. It's really ***NOT*** appreciated.
> well, not deciding on the release architectures for over a year now makes my
> job difficult as well. still trying to get it done.
If you have specific concerns with a specific arch feel free to raise
them on -release and the corresponding port's mailing list, and we'll
take that into account.  Not in this thread.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: