Re: GCC 4.2 transition
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 12:31:50PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > The change is done in unstable. Unstable have no security support.
> > > Should I assume you don't know how to properly build packages for a dist
> > > which is not unstable?
> > He might be referring to the fact that xulrunner has been out-of-date on
> > mips* for over a month now due to build failures that look like they are
> > probably a gcc bug, thereby preventing security fixes (and updates to 27
> > other significant packages) from reaching testing.
> He was asked to report back results with a recent gcc-snapshot; did I
> miss an answer?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=123;bug=428582
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Reply to: