Re: GCC 4.2 transition
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 12:05:54PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 11:51:47AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > I have another objection. I'd like all mozilla security updates to be built
> > before gcc 4.2 becomes the default, because they don't build correctly yet,
> > and I am (still) waiting for an upstream comment on how to fix it.
> The change is done in unstable. Unstable have no security support.
> Should I assume you don't know how to properly build packages for a dist
> which is not unstable?
He might be referring to the fact that xulrunner has been out-of-date on
mips* for over a month now due to build failures that look like they are
probably a gcc bug, thereby preventing security fixes (and updates to 27
other significant packages) from reaching testing.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Reply to: