[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Bug target/29825] [4.1 regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084




------- Comment #14 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-11-14 16:34 -------
(In reply to comment #13)
> > While that can help in this case, I think letting make_tree/expand_expr combo
> > create invalid RTL is very dangerous (and, at least from i386 backend POV,
> > some of the PIC UNSPECs not surrounded by CONST are invalid, the backend
> > guarantees that wherever it creates them it adds the CONST around).

Did you read what I wrote, I said it is not valid, the x86 back-end should
really be accepting it?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29825

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.



Reply to: