Bug#200003: Any progress?
Ludovic Brenta writes:
> Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de> writes:
> > The second thing is to remove the gfdl'd texi files from the sources,
> > so that the package still builds. The idea is to replace these files
> > with dummy content, such that the build still succeds and the Makefile
> > don't have to be patched.
>
> Unless I am mistaken, there was a Debian General Resolution lately
> that allows GFDL'd documents in main, provided they have no
> front-cover text, no back-cover text and no invariants. I am
> concerned that wholesale deletion of all documentation from the GCC
> package is a disservice to users. Should we not rather assess each
> document individually and remove only those that fail the General
> Resolution criteria?
sure, are there any?
Reply to: