[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#200003: Any progress?



Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de> writes:
> The second thing is to remove the gfdl'd texi files from the sources,
> so that the package still builds.  The idea is to replace these files
> with dummy content, such that the build still succeds and the Makefile
> don't have to be patched.

Unless I am mistaken, there was a Debian General Resolution lately
that allows GFDL'd documents in main, provided they have no
front-cover text, no back-cover text and no invariants.  I am
concerned that wholesale deletion of all documentation from the GCC
package is a disservice to users.  Should we not rather assess each
document individually and remove only those that fail the General
Resolution criteria?

-- 
Ludovic Brenta.




Reply to: