Re: qt4-x11

[Brian Nelson <pyro@debian.org>]

Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org> writes:

> On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 09:47:19AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 08:31:07AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
>> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 03:22:50PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> > > qt4-x11 needs to be rebuilt on m68k, anything using it currently will
>> > > give errors that libXcursor.la can't be found.
>> 
>> > > Anyone know whether GCC 4.1 has the same issues? If not, should we
>> > > proceed to build QT with GCC 4.1, or is that not advisable?
>> > 
>> > At least it shouldn't take long to find out if that ICE applies.
>> 
>> In point of fact it doesn't fail there with gcc-4.1. Now how would the
>> qt folks feel about us compiling with gcc-4.1?
>
> Only one way to find out. QT/KDE folks, your opinion please?

Umm, should I have an opinion?  If you want to change the compiler used
in debian/rules, it'll probably be a pain since the Qt build system
tends to ignore variables like CC and CXX.  Otherwise I don't see why it
would matter.

-- 
Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.