[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Bug target/17180] [3.4 Regression] nearly all g77 tests fail



------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com  2004-08-31 15:11 -------
Subject: Re:  [3.4 Regression] nearly all g77 tests fail

ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:

>------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-08-31 13:18 -------
>Created an attachment (id=7010)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7010&action=view)
> --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7010&action=view)
>Proposed fix.
>
>Mark, does it look ok to you?  It was bootstrapped/regtested (C,F77) on x86,
>SPARC32 and SPARC64.
>
You're replacing both sizeof(mallocArea_) and sizeof(mallocArea_*) with 
a size based on sizeof(mallocArea_*) roundup up to the byte-version of 
BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT.  OK, I ssee that mallocArea is itself a pointer, so 
in both cases the sizes you're replacing are the same.  In any case, it 
looks as though this patch is safe; at worst, we allocate some more memory.

Patch OK for 3.4.



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17180

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.



Reply to: