Re: Processed: your mail
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 10:25:21AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 06:14:30PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> > Just because the binaries are built somewhere else does not defer the
> > fact that the bug is in the source. He's having a problem building the
> > kernel-source package, and that has to be fixed there, not in
> > kernel-image-sparc. Even if I put a patch in kernel-image-sparc, it
> > doesn't fix his problem.
> >
> > Fact, kernel-image-sparc builds from kernel-source _without_ patches.
>
> OK. I'm happy to do this as long as you don't mind any patch
> conflicts as a result this should your architecture require
> patches later on.
>
> If you agree with that, please reassign the bug back to the 'kernel'
> package.
I have no problem with that.
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/
Reply to: