[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#205548: gcc-3.3: linking fails for large shared libaries



Thanks Chris

i got that backtrace too..

from module sc
==============
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x7006157c in bfd_elf64_archive_write_armap () from /usr/lib/libbfd-2.14.90.0.5.so
(gdb) where
#0  0x7006157c in bfd_elf64_archive_write_armap ()  from /usr/lib/libbfd-2.14.90.0.5.so
#1  0x7006c9b4 in bfd_elf32_bfd_final_link () from /usr/lib/libbfd-2.14.90.0.5.so
#2  0x7004e384 in bfd_hash_traverse () from /usr/lib/libbfd-2.14.90.0.5.so

and from module sd
=================
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x7006157c in bfd_elf64_archive_write_armap () from /usr/lib/libbfd-2.14.90.0.5.so
(gdb) where
#0  0x7006157c in bfd_elf64_archive_write_armap () from /usr/lib/libbfd-2.14.90.0.5.so
#1  0x7006c9b4 in bfd_elf32_bfd_final_link () from /usr/lib/libbfd-2.14.90.0.5.so
#2  0x7004e384 in bfd_hash_traverse () from /usr/lib/libbfd-2.14.90.0.5.so


On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 12:39:11AM +0200, Chris Halls wrote:
> 
> I managed to get a backtrace:
> 
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> #0  0x7006157c in bfd_elf64_archive_write_armap () from /usr/lib/libbfd-2.14.90.0.5.so
> #1  0x7006c9b4 in bfd_elf32_bfd_final_link () from /usr/lib/libbfd-2.14.90.0.5.so
> #2  0x7004e384 in bfd_hash_traverse () from /usr/lib/libbfd-2.14.90.0.5.so



Reply to: