Re: gcc-defaults still depending on gcj-3.2?

To: neroden@twcny.rr.com (Nathanael Nerode)
Cc: debian-gcc@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: gcc-defaults still depending on gcj-3.2?
From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 08:37:24 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 16176.41508.369303.942729@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030806060330.GA2512@twcny.rr.com>
References: <[🔎] 20030806060330.GA2512@twcny.rr.com>

Nathanael Nerode writes:
> It looks like gcc-defaults depends on gcj-3.2 on sparc.  Or at least
> the 'testing' scripts think so.  Huh?  :-/

gcc-defaults (1.7) unstable; urgency=low

  * Add <GNU_TYPE>-{cpp,gcc,g++,gcj,g77} symlinks.
  * Bump sparc back down to 3.2. Increase our epoch to compensate.

 -- Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>  Wed,  4 Jun 2003 11:39:53 -0400

the coming 1.8:

  * Make 3.3 the default for sparc again.

Reply to:

References:
- gcc-defaults still depending on gcj-3.2?
  - From: neroden@twcny.rr.com (Nathanael Nerode)

Prev by Date: gcc-defaults still depending on gcj-3.2?
Next by Date: default CPU target for ix86 based ports
Previous by thread: gcc-defaults still depending on gcj-3.2?
Next by thread: default CPU target for ix86 based ports
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread