gcc-defaults still depending on gcj-3.2?

To: debian-gcc@lists.debian.org
Subject: gcc-defaults still depending on gcj-3.2?
From: neroden@twcny.rr.com (Nathanael Nerode)
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 02:03:30 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030806060330.GA2512@twcny.rr.com>

It looks like gcc-defaults depends on gcj-3.2 on sparc.  Or at least
the 'testing' scripts think so.  Huh?  :-/

-- 
Nathanael Nerode  <neroden at gcc.gnu.org>
http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcc-defaults still depending on gcj-3.2?
  - From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>

Prev by Date: Bug#203840: marked as done (Need newer gcc 3.3 branch version to fix important ICE on IA64)
Next by Date: Re: gcc-defaults still depending on gcj-3.2?
Previous by thread: Bug#203351: marked as done ([PR 11713] [3.3/3.4 regression] c++ parser error)
Next by thread: Re: gcc-defaults still depending on gcj-3.2?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread