Bug#155002: SuperH supports
YAEGASHI Takeshi writes:
> Hi,
>
> In the article <[🔎] 200208020059.g720xcs28211@mule.m17n.org>,
> NIIBE Yutaka <gniibe@m17n.org> wrote:
>
> > In 3.0.4, we have no Fortran because of nasty reload bugs of SuperH,
> > we have no Java because of lack of runtime support. Those two are
> > already have been worked done nicely for 3.1.
> >
> > Forthcoming 3.2 has ABI change for C++, it would become big step for
> > us. Although our test coverage status is good for 3.1 (it seems no
> > regression against 3.0.4 for C) (and we have new things Java and
> > Fortran) , but C++ ABI change is major change.
>
> Then it would be nice if we could have gcc-3.1(3.2?) debs for SuperH.
> Is it possible to mix up objects of gcc-3.0 and g77-3.1 or gcj-3.1?
I think so. But probably it's not worth the trouble. As you see on
debian-gcc we plan to change the default compiler to 3.2 for all
architectures soon.
Reply to: